Legal Opinion

State v. Marquardt

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 21, 2001No. 01-0065-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.

¶ 1. In this interlocutory appeal, Bill Paul Marquardt appeals from an order (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant for his home; (2) denying his request for a Franks 1 hearing; and (3) denying his motion to suppress evidence from a warrantless search of his vehicle.

¶ 2. We conclude first that there was insufficient probable cause to justify the search warrant for Marquardt's home. Because our supreme court recently adopted the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, see State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶ 74, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625, we…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Keehn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Bill Paul Marquardt v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  4. State v. LindgrenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  5. State v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API