Legal Opinion
Normand v. Baxter State Park Authority
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 6, 1986Published
1Opinion of the Court
509 A.2d 640 (1986)
Roger NORMAND et al.
v.
BAXTER STATE PARK AUTHORITY.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued January 15, 1986.
Decided May 6, 1986.
Barbara B. Lounsbury (orally), Auburn, for plaintiffs.
Rufus E. Brown, Deputy Atty. Gen. (orally), Augusta, for defendant.
Robert J. Allen, Downeast Law Offices, Augusta, for intervenor, Natural Resources Council of Maine.
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs, individual users of Baxter State Park,[1] and intervenor Natural Resources Council of Maine challenge the legality of Park Rule 19,[2] a regulation issued by defendant Baxter State Park Authority…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hossler Ex Rel. Dows v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Fitzgerald v. Baxter State Park AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Cumberland Farms Northern, Inc. v. Maine Milk CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Spickler v. FlynnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Carter v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.