Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 20, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court. Eor opinion of the Supreme Court, see ante p. 67.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hendkickson, J.
The writ of error in this cause brings up for review the judgment of the Supreme Court affirming the proceedings had in the Middlesex Quarter Sessions on an indictment charging the plaintiff in error with the offence of obtaining money under false pretences.
The indictment consisted of but a single count, charging the accused, who was an attorney-at-law, with the commission of that offence in the obtaining from one Ellen Burk, his client, the sum of $1,800, on a certain day named therein.
It is insisted that there was error committed at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Beasley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Commonwealth v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Webster v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- State v. VorbackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LamoreauxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- LaShar v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- State v. MannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- State v. ApplebySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899