Legal Opinion

Atlas v. Whitham

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 17, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff has filed twenty-four assignments of error, many of which are repetitious and most of which are not in accordance with our rules. Assignments specifying that the court erred in its findings or conclusions because there was not sufficient evidence to establish them, and the like, are improper. Rules of Appellate Procedure, §§ 7, 11, Form D II. This is also true of assignments that the court erred in finding or failing to find proven allegations in the pleadings or facts recited in the assignments or in reaching certain conclusions from the evidence. Assignments of error should be…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WhippleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Penfield Manufacturing Co. v. ChristoniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  3. Genovese v. Winmore Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  4. Parrott Chemical Co. v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API