Legal Opinion

Mine Inspectors

Pennsylvania Department of Justice

Decided June 9, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gollmak, Dep. Att’y-Gen.,

Your favor of the 13th ult., addressed to the Attorney-General, is at hand. You ask to be advised whether the Mine Examining Board is justified in refusing to grant a certificate of qualification to an applicant for the office of mine inspector who has reached his fiftieth birthday, even though he possesses all the other qualifications required by the act.

Section 3, article xix, of the Act of June 9, 1911, P., L. 756, relating to the qualifications of bituminous mine inspectors, provides:

*17“The qualifications of candidates for the office of inspector shall be certified…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kendall v. KingsleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Philadelphia & Erie Railroad v. Catawissa RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  3. Richardson v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Winans v. ThorpAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. People ex rel. Cornell Steamboat Co. v. HornbeckNew York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API