Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. McGoldrick

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDi Giovanna, J.

This is a motion for judgment pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106, and rule 212 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action.

In the course of administrative proceedings before the local rent administrator, orders were issued establishing maximum legal rent for certain apartments in the petitioner’s building. The petitioner landlord of the building filed a protest with the State Rent Administrator which is still pending and undetermined. In this action for declaratory judgment the landlord seeks to have the order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. In re HalpernNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Suppus v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. People Ex Rel. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Ivory v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kellas Real Estate Corp. v. GluckmannNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Mandle v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API