Legal Opinion
United States v. James Arthur Hillyard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 1982No. 81-1413PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant James Hillyard suffered the jury’s conviction on five counts of interstate transportation of stolen motor vehicles, six counts of concealment of stolen motor vehicles, and one count of interstate transportation of stolen property. Hillyard contends principally that some of the stolen items were seized by general, and so unlawful, search warrants, and also that a logbook and map were seized improperly from the cab of one vehicle. We find the warrants gave proper directions to the officers conducting the search and were lawful and in satisfaction of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. George OchsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Maurice AbramsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- United States v. John Spilotro Herbert Blitzstein and Joseph C. BlaskoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Enrique EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Peter John WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.