Legal Opinion

Moser v. Fieland

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

A counterclaim need not be related to the issues of the complaint. In accordance with the statute (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 262, 266), a counterclaim may be any cause of action in favor of the defendant. The statute is to be given a liberal construction to effectuate its purpose to avoid multiplicity of suits and allow determination of all' controversies between litigants in one action. The only condition attached to its interposition is whether it can be conveniently and fairly determined in connection with the cause of action. (Nussbaum v. Sobel, 269 App. Div. 105.) Moreover, interposition of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nussbaum v. SobelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Plaut v. PlautAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PetersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  2. Torre v. ZuzaNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Mt. Zion Baptist Church of Port Chester, Inc. v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API