Legal Opinion

Urdiales v. Concord Technologies Delaware, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided November 20, 2003No. 14-02-00244-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.

Richard Urdíales, Jr. sued his former employer, appellee Concord Technologies Delaware, Inc., because his supervisor, Alfredo Cantu, assaulted him. The trial court granted summary judgment on his claims, apparently concluding that (1) they were barred by the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act and (2) he was not engaged in a protected activity. We affirm for these same reasons and a few additional ones.

A. Factual Background

The following facts are drawn from Urd-íales’ petition. On March 28, 2000, Cantu struck Urdíales in the chest with a steel pipe during an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Reed Tool Co. v. CopelinTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Medina v. HerreraTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Castleberry v. Goolsby Building Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Houston Transit Co. v. FelderTexas Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Waffle House, Inc. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio v. GrabenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Stewart v. Lexicon Genetics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
  5. Cooper v. Wal-Mart Transportation, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API