Legal Opinion

State v. Grandy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 2018No. COA18-79Published

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*691 Defendant appeals her two convictions for embezzlement. Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that her motion to dismiss the embezzlement charges should have been granted because her employer had not entrusted her with the funds since the employer's bank required two employees jointly to use a security measure provided by the bank to issue checks. Because the evidence showed that defendant's employer had entrusted defendant with both security devices, despite the bank's intention to require participation by two employees, the trial court did not err in denying her motion.

*692 I.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. RupeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. KeyesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API