Titus v. Hill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s first, sec*912ond and fourth causes of action. The first cause of action alleges a claim for false arrest and imprisonment. Defendants argue that plaintiff was arrested pursuant to a facially valid warrant, proof of which defeats an action for false arrest (Broughton v State of New York, 37 NY2d 451, cert denied sub nom. Schanbarger v Kellogg, 423 US 929; Boose v City of Rochester,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Boose v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Barr v. County of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Russ v. State Employees Federal Credit UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. MayhewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Tucker v. County of JeffersonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- People v. JohnsonRochester City Court · 1995
- People v. RhoadesNew York Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.