Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Starr

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided January 31, 1868PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[This is a suit in equity for partition of certain real estate in the city of Portland, Oregon, brought by John R. Lamb and Emma, his wife, and Ida Squires, heirs of Nancy Lownsdale and D. H. Lownsdale, against Lewis M. Starr and the heirs other than plaintiff of D. H. Lownsdale, to wit, J. P. O. Lownsdale, Millard O. Lownsdale (by guardian), Ruth A. Lownsdale (by guardian), Mary E. Cooper, Hiram Smith, and Hannah Smith. The ease is now heard upon demurrer and pleas to bill.]

1Opinion of the Court

DEADY, District Judge.

This is a suit for partition of block 218, situate in the city of Portland, and to declare void a purchase thereof by the defendant, Starr, because the conveyance was taken by Starr, with notice, and in violation of certain trusts with which the property was charged in the hands of Starr’s grantors. Among other things the bill states, that on April 15, 1854. Nancy Lowns-dale died seized of an estate in fee in the west half of donation claims 40 and 66, containing 90 acres of land and embracing block 21S in the city of Portland, leaving as her lieirs-at-law, her four…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. KnickerbackerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  2. Wilkin v. WilkinNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  3. Coxe v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  4. Ford v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Vandolf v. OtisOregon Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sage Land & Improvement Co. v. RipleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API