Legal Opinion

United States v. Collins

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided January 20, 1919No. 2524PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Gou.ld Collins was charged with violation of the Reed amendment, and he moves to quash the indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

JACK, District Judge.

The defendant in count 1 of the indictment stands charged with violation of that part of the postal appropriation act of March 3, 1917 (39 Stat. 1069, c. 162 [Comp. St. 1918, § 8739a]), known as the “Reed Amendment,” which is as follows:

“Whoever shall order, purchase, or cause intoxicating liquors to be transported in interstate commerce, except for scientific, sacramental, medicinal, and mechanical purposes, into any state or territory, the laws of which state or territory prohibit the manufacture or sale therein of intoxicating liquors *870for beverage purposes, shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Ex Parte MeyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Dick & Brothers Quincy Brewery v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. McAdams v. Wells Fargo & Co. ExpressDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  2. Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
  3. United States v. CollinsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API