Legal Opinion

Krell v. Davidson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1985No. Nos. 48217, 48892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNYDER, Judge.

These cross appeals arise from a dispute about the ownership of a three-foot strip of land between the parties’ neighboring residential lots in south St. Louis. Eugene V. Krell, Elizabeth T. Krell, his wife, and Helen Tindorf (referred to collectively as “the Krells”) claimed ownership of the strip by adverse possession. Rodney 0. Davidson and Kathleen A. Davidson contended that their ownership, based on the City of St. Louis records, was paramount. The trial court found that the Krells were entitled to a portion of the disputed three-foot strip by adverse possession and both…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Teson v. VasquezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Edie v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Miller v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weaver v. HelmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Vecchiotti v. TegethoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. M.P. Industries, Inc. v. AxelrodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Moore v. DudleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Terre Du Lac, Inc. v. FuhrmeisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API