Legal Opinion

Landon v. Morris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court in Chancery, Fort Smith District. Styles T. Rowe, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, J.

Appellee filed his. complaint in equity against appellants, claiming title to. an undivided one-third of the real estate described, alleging that appellants own the other two-thirds, and praying for partition. The defendants answered, denying that plaintiff had any title to or interest in the lands.

Appellants invoke the rule, established and repeatedly adhered to by the decisions of this court, that partition cannot be had, in a court of equity, of lands held adversely. Criscoe v. Hambrick, 47 Ark. 235; Moore v. Gordon, 44 Ark. 334; London v. Overby, 40 Ark. 155; Byers v. Danly, 27 Ark. 77.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  2. Criscoe v. HambrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  3. Byers v. DanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
  4. London v. OverbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  5. Tatum v. CroomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spaulding Manufacturing Co. v. GodboldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Nelson v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. LaCotts v. PikeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Simmons v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Hill v. Cherokee Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API