People v. Hamilton
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
We agree with the Appellate Division that defendant’s convictions required reversal because his Sixth Amendment right "to be confronted with the witnesses against him” was violated by the People’s introduction, as part of its case-in-chief at trial, of the Grand Jury testimony of a witness, Patricia Lee.
In her Grand Jury testimony, Lee stated that defendant had made incriminating admissions to her. Prior to trial, Lee informed the trial court that if called to testify at trial, she would invoke her Fifth…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Holtzman v. HellenbrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. GeraciNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. CottoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. SmartNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. DelarosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. CottoNew York Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.