United States v. Lockwood
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, District Judge.
Counsel for twenty-six defendants accused of violating the selective service law moves to dismiss the indictments on the ground that all the defendants have been denied their right to a speedy trial. Amicus suggests that there is a strong likelihood that some or all of the indictments are not well founded under the selective service law. Until each defendant’s situation has been examined separately, dismissal on these grounds will not lie. As indicated below, the government has been directed to supply counsel with copies of the selective service…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Jack B. Weinstein, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Sidney SalzmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. SalzmannDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
- United States v. Sidney SalzmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976