Legal Opinion

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Naval Observatory

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 4, 2001No. CIV. A. 01-1293(ESH)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. has sued the United States Naval Observatory under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, alleging that defendant failed to timely respond to its request for expedited processing of its request for documents and failed to disclose responsive documents. Defendant has moved to dismiss on the grounds that plaintiff has failed to exhaust administrative remedies. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff submitted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. Edward Spannaus v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  3. Kay v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dale v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. In Re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria on Nov. 11District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Houser v. ChurchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  5. Rodriguez-Cervantes v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API