Legal Opinion

City of Newark v. Block 86, Lot 30, 350 Washington St.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 24, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Herbert, J. S. 0.

Plaintiff City of Newark, sues under the In Bern Tax Eorclosure Act (N. J. 8. A. 54:5-104.29 et seq.) to foreclose tax sale certificates covering several pieces of property. The defendants hold interests in the various parcels. Although they do not all set up the same defenses, the following contentions against the city’s alleged rights to foreclosure judgments are found in the combined cases: that the In Bern Tax Foreclosure Act is *471unconstitutional; if not unconstitutional, it is meant to apply only to vacant land; and even if the statute is applicable to this case,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of West Orange v. BLOCK 107New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Serion v. ThorntonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Kuhn v. Sadinsky, No. Knl-Cv-92-0523165-S (Mar. 14, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API