Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Woodbury v. Coller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1972No. 72-208PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This prohibition action is directed to two judges and a prosecuting attorney. The criminal cases which are the subject of the instant prohibition action are no longer assigned to appellee Judge Floyd A. Coller. Prohibition does not lie as to one who neither claims nor is about to exercise jurisdiction.

A writ of prohibition is sought to prevent appellee Daniel T. Spitler from proceeding with the prosecution of the appellants’ criminal cases. Prohibition will not lie as to a prosecutor who is duty bound to proceed to prosecute pursuant to indictment. The prosecuting attorney will be required to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Woodbury v. SpitlerOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re SusiOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API