Andresen v. Eastern Realty Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiffs lost this case under a G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6) motion since the trial judge believed that they had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Although neither the defendants’ answer nor the court’s judgment mention the rule specifically, defendants’ answer and the judgment both speak in terms of dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint. A G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6) motion is a proper vehicle for dismissing a complaint when it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
We hold that it was error to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint in this case. “A…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Stegall v. Housing Authority of the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pangburn v. SaadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State ex rel. Tennessee Department of Health & EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State of Tenn. v. ENVIRON. MANAGEMENT COM'NCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Davis v. DavisNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
- Pangburn v. SaadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.