Rochon v. State
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Amestoy, C J.
¶ 1. Plaintiffs appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the State of Vermont in this suit for personal injuries caused by an accident with a police cruiser that-was traveling to the' scene of an emergency. Plaintiffs contend that Vermont’s emergency vehicle statute, 23 V.S.A. § 1015, requires a showing of negligence before imposing liability, not a showing of recklessness. We reject plaintiffs’ argument, and conclude that 23 V.S.A. § 1015 precludes an action in negligence and requires a showing of recklessness for injuries sustained in an accident with an emergency…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Saarinen v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wright v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Amarillo v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Powers v. Office of Child SupportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Denis Bail Bonds, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kaho'ohanohano ex rel. Morales-Kaho'ohanohano v. Department of Human ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Appeal of Electronic Industries AllianceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- CitiFinancial, Inc. v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Kahoohanohano v. DHS, STATEHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- CitiFinancial, Inc. v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.