Legal Opinion

Rochon v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 27, 2004No. 03-316PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amestoy, C J.

¶ 1. Plaintiffs appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the State of Vermont in this suit for personal injuries caused by an accident with a police cruiser that-was traveling to the' scene of an emergency. Plaintiffs contend that Vermont’s emergency vehicle statute, 23 V.S.A. § 1015, requires a showing of negligence before imposing liability, not a showing of recklessness. We reject plaintiffs’ argument, and conclude that 23 V.S.A. § 1015 precludes an action in negligence and requires a showing of recklessness for injuries sustained in an accident with an emergency…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Saarinen v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Wright v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of Amarillo v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Powers v. Office of Child SupportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  5. Denis Bail Bonds, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kaho'ohanohano ex rel. Morales-Kaho'ohanohano v. Department of Human ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Appeal of Electronic Industries AllianceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  3. CitiFinancial, Inc. v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. Kahoohanohano v. DHS, STATEHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. CitiFinancial, Inc. v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API