Consolidated Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. Blanda
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 89 N. J. L. 104.
1Opinion of the Court
*136The opinion of the court was delivered by
Walker, Chancellor.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
We think, however, it should be pointed out that this case differs from that of James E. Crossley v. William H. Connolly Co. (post p. 238), No. 92 of this term, opinion by Mr. Justice Mintum, in this court. In that case there was a proper demand for a jury at the day fixed for trial, and the trial was actually commenced before the jury which was empaneled. An adjournment was granted bjr…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of Benny L. ROACH and Edith Roach, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Indiana Investment Co. v. EvensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936