Legal Opinion

Hustead v. Bendix Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1983No. 54,681PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Prager, J.:

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs, Dr. Robert F. Hustead and Joy K. Hustead, his wife, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an airplane crash. The defendants involved on this appeal are the Bendix Corporation, Avco Lycoming Corporation, The Piper Aircraft Corporation, and Midwest Piper, Inc.

Each plaintiffs action was brought on the basis of three legal theories: (1) negligence, (2) strict liability in tort, and (3) breach of implied warranty under K.S.A. 84-2-314. The trial court sustained the separate motions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. WesterhausSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Pedi Bares, Inc. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Fisher v. PendletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Temmen v. Kent-Brown Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rose v. via Christi Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Credit Union of America v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Zurn Constructors, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GallowayDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985
  5. George Turley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API