Legal Opinion

Naugle v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 2, 1987No. 69734PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EHRLICH, Justice.

We have for review Naugle v. State, 497 So.2d 664, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following question:

DOES FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.191(b)(1) APPLY TO PERSONS HELD IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF CHARGES PENDING IN THIS STATE?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

Consistent with our recent decision in State v. Bivona, 496 So.2d 130 (Fla.1986), the district court below concluded that Rule 3.191(b)(1) does so apply. Accordingly, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

McDonald,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BivonaSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Naugle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API