Legal Opinion
In re Reynaldo R.
New York City Family Court
Decided March 7, 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRalph E. Cory, J.
Petitioner, father of Reynaldo, alleges that respondent should he judged a person in need of supervision and dealt with in accordance with article 7 of the Family Court Act in that “ respondent absconded from home on November 28th, 1972 and refuses to return. The respondent does not obey the just and lawful commands of his parents and has been excessively truant from school.”
The facts as developed from the direct testimony of respondent’s mother and respondent and cross-examination of respondent’s mother by the Law Guardian are substantially as follows: The petitioner (father of child) did…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Andrew R.New York City Family Court · 1982
- In re Guy II.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- BM v. DobulerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- People v. PolovchakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- In re PriceNew York City Family Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.