In re July 1986 Ohio Bar Examination Applicant No. 719
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurrence · HolmesHolmes, J.
The determination of a just and reasonable result in these bar examination cases has been, as noted by the majority and dissenting opinions, a most perplexing encounter. One can honestly come down on either side of the issues presented; however, when all factors are weighed in perspective, I must join those who have concluded that Applicant No. 719 and Applicant No. 1327 may continue in the practice of law without retaking the Ohio bar examination.
First, I realize that it is the duty of this court to protect the integrity of the bar examination system in Ohio and, in doing so, remain…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Douglas; Concurrence · Brown.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re July 1986 Ohio Bar Examination Applicant No. 1327Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- In re July 1986 Ohio Bar Examination Applicant No. 719Ohio Supreme Court · 1991