Legal Opinion

Rucker v. M'Neely

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1836PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Trespass quare clausum fregit. Special demurrer to the declaration, and judgment for the defendant.

The declaration commences as follows:—Shelby county, ss. Elzy Rucker, by Westley Rucker, who is admitted by the Court here to prosecute for the plaintiff, who is an infant within the age of 21 years, as the guardian of the said plaintiff, complains, &c. It is stated as one of the causes of demurrer, that the plaintiff should have sued by next friend and not by guardian. In this, the defendant is mistaken. The institution of the suit by guardian is unobjectionable, and the form of the declaration…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Owens v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Parrish v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  3. Thayer v. SherlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Green v. BoodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Hathaway v. OsborneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API