Legal Opinion

Burn Line, Ltd. v. United States & Australasia S. S. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 15, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Admiralty. Suit for charter hire. On exceptions to libel and to answer.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This is an action brought by. the Burn Line, Limited, owner of the steamship Oakburn, to recover from the United States and Australasia Steamship Company, a second install*424ment of hire alleged to be due under a charter of affreightment, dated January 24, 1906, amounting to $14,964.48.

The libel alleges as follows:

“Tim'd. On or about January 24, 1906, at New York, a charter party in writing was entered into between the libellant and the respondent by which the steamship Oakburn was chartered to the respondent to carry a cargo from New York to several named ports in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. De Sola v. PomaresDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burn Line, Ltd. v. United States & A. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API