Legal Opinion

Burch v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action on two policies of life insurance. When the policies were issued they did not contain any double indemnity or accidental death benefit provisions. Subsequently such provisions were made available by concession. The policies provide that, in the event death resulted from bodily injury sustained solely through external, violent and accidental means, *451the defendant would pay double indemnity. The insured was pregnant. She was taken to the delivery room in a hospital and prepared for delivery in the usual and customary manner. Preparatory to delivery a small amount of ether was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mansbacher v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Meyer v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Mansbacher v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LIFE &C. INS. CO. OF TENNESSEE v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Hoyt v. John Hancock Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Rosenthal v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Ash v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Denton v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API