Legal Opinion

Hinsey v. Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 27, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, against the indorser of a promissory note. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

The Kansas City Omnibus & Carriage Co., a .Missouri corporation, by its president on August 20, 1891, made its two promissory notes of that date, one for $2,866.67, and the other for $2,866.66, payable four and three years after date, respectively, to the order of John A. Hinsey, at the Missouri National Bank of Kansas City, Mo., with interest after date at 7 perceht per annum until paid, payable semiannually. On each note appears indorsed, beside payments of interest, the following: “I hereby assign the within note to Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing Co., and guarantee its payment at maturity.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Montelius v. CharlesIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Wood v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Bond v. BraggIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Dietrich v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schoepfer v. TommackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  2. Studebaker Bros. Mfg. Co. v. HinseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API