Legal Opinion

In re Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The referee to whom it was referred to take the proof of the charges against this attorney has reported upon the facts and as to each of the .three several charges has reported that the said respondent was gúilty'of deceit, fraud, maljiractice and gross unprofessional conduct. A careful examination of,the record satisfies us that the finding and conclusions of the referee are fully sustained by the evidence.

One of the charges was based upon the misappropriation and conversion to his own use of the sum of $50 received by the attorney upon the collection of an amount due upon a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re RotweinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. In re CowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API