Russell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Judge
—The appellant was convicted of burglary of a private residence at night-time. The residence was a room occupied by Conger, and on the twenty-fifth of February the burglary was proved to have taken place.
The State relied for a conviction solely upon evidence of possession by the appellant of the fruits of the crime. Upon that subject, this was the evidence: On the fifth of April, following the burglary, Conger identified a pocket-knife and a watch chain which were stolen from his room, and which he found in possession of a police detective at the police station in Austin. This detective’s…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Maples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Rubio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Prather v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- McLemore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.