Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. 316 Charles, LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 9, 2021No. 1:19-cv-03252Unknown
1Opinion
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHAMBERS OF 101 WEST LOMBARD STREET STEPHANIE A. GALLAGHER BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE (410) 962-7780 MDD_SAGchambers@mdd.uscourts.gov February 8, 2021 LETTER ORDER RE: Ramirez v. 316 Charles, LLC, et al. Civil Case No. SAG-19-3252 Dear Counsel: I have considered the Motions to Alter or Amend Judgment, ECF 34 and ECF 35, filed by Haluk Kantar and 9400 Snowden River, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff’s Opposition, ECF 36. Defendants have not filed a Reply, and their deadline has elapsed. No hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6 (D.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Mumbower v. CallicottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- McComb v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Broadvox-CLEC, LLC v. AT & T Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015