Legal Opinion
In re Markman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 10, 1941No. 75050PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
The bankrupt makes two motions, one that the question of his discharge previously denied, be again referred to the referee for a hearing, the other for a stay pending disposition of the first.
On the original application the referee granted the bankrupt’s discharge. On review by the district court the referee’s order was reversed and discharge denied. The ground of the reversal as stated in an opinion rendered by the U. S. District Court on May 7, 1941, 41 F.Supp. 94, was the failure of the bankrupt to keep proper records. The papers before me do not disclose on what…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. ElliotteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- United States v. EastCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Shreiner v. Farmers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Lamson Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- In re SlohmDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sicherman v. Ohio Rehabilitation Services Commission (In Re Dial Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
- Matter of May Lee Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975