Legal Opinion

Seaverns v. Lischinski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 2, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in Case, for personal injuries. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County: the Hon. Eaelin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. 'Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendant. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

The appellant (defendant below) was the operator of a grain elevator, and the appellee was a laborer in his employ, who, among other things, assisted in moving railroad cars into and out of the elevator.

The cars were hauled to and forth by means of a capstan, with ropes, tackle, etc., operated bv steam power. To haul cars out of the elevator upon their appropriate tracks and switches, a sling six or eight feet long, made of rope, was fastened to a timber and the railroad cross ties, at a distance from the capstan of about 120 feet down the track in the direction the cars were to be hauled,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sanitary District v. CullertonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. James v. DexterIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Peoria Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Peoria Terminal Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Culbertson & Blair Packing & Provision Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Garrity v. Hamburger Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Colby v. HerronAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  3. Schaefer v. EigerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API