Legal Opinion

Inline Connection Corp. v. AOL Time Warner Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 18, 2005No. C.A. 02-272-MPT, C.A. 02-477-MPTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a patent infringement case. On April 12, 2002, Inline Communication Corporation (“Inline”) 1 filed suit alleging infringement by AOL Time Warner Incorporated, 2 America Online, Inc. (“AOL”), 3 and EarthLink, Inc. (“EarthLink”) 4 (hereinafter, AOL and EarthLink are referred to as “defendants”) of four of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,844,596 (the “ ’596 patent”), 6,243,446 (the “’446 patent”), 6,542,585 (the “ ’585 patent”), and 6,236,718 (the “ ’718 patent”) (collectively “the patents-in-suit”). 5 Inline alleges…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Dentsply International, Inc. v. Kerr Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  4. Schering Corp. v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
  5. Applera Corp. v. Micromass UK Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. W.R. Grace & Co. v. Chakarian (In Re W.R. Grace & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API