Inline Connection Corp. v. AOL Time Warner Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a patent infringement case. On April 12, 2002, Inline Communication Corporation (“Inline”) 1 filed suit alleging infringement by AOL Time Warner Incorporated, 2 America Online, Inc. (“AOL”), 3 and EarthLink, Inc. (“EarthLink”) 4 (hereinafter, AOL and EarthLink are referred to as “defendants”) of four of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,844,596 (the “ ’596 patent”), 6,243,446 (the “’446 patent”), 6,542,585 (the “ ’585 patent”), and 6,236,718 (the “ ’718 patent”) (collectively “the patents-in-suit”). 5 Inline alleges…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Dentsply International, Inc. v. Kerr Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Schering Corp. v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Applera Corp. v. Micromass UK Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- W.R. Grace & Co. v. Chakarian (In Re W.R. Grace & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008