Legal Opinion

People v. Buckner

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1973No. Docket Nos. 21918, 22000, 22415PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, J.

Defendants were charged by information with conspiracy to sell marijuana (Pen. Code, § 182) in count I, sale of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, §11531) in count II, possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530.5) in count HI, and possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530) in count IV. Motions pursuant to Penal Code sections 995 and 1538.5 to set aside the information and to suppress evidence were denied.

The cases of defendants Buckner and Marx were submitted on the transcript of the preliminary hearing. Each was found not guilty of counts I, II,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SakellsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. GalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. GlasspooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. NegreteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API