Legal Opinion

City of Lyndhurst v. McGinness

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 2000No. 76751PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John T. Patton, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-appellant Joseph T. MeGinness (defendant) appeals the decision of the trial court finding that he violated plaintiff-appellee city of Lyndhurst Ordinance 414.10, “no right turn on red.” Defendant argues that the no-turn-on-red sign was improperly posted pursuant to the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and that the trial court erred by failing to rule on his motion to dismiss prior to trial.

The record indicates that on February 27, 1999, at 4:17 p.m., defendant was driving south on a main thoroughfare in Lyndhurst. Defendant approached an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. TolbertOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. City of Maple Heights v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Shapiro v. ButtsOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. State v. TrainerHamilton County Municipal Court · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oakwood Village v. BlumOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Middletown v. MyersOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. BowmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. City of Cleveland v. BarkerCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API