Legal Opinion

Mateo v. T & H Enterprises

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), *412entered February 28, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant T & H Enterprise’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal is the most drastic sanction contemplated by the CPLR for failure to comply with discovery and should be imposed only when the conduct of the offending party was willful, contumacious, or in bad faith (see Palacios v New York City Tr. Auth., 50 AD3d 520 [2008]; Cespedes v Mike & Jac Trucking Corp., 305 AD2d 222 [2003]; Tsai v Hernandez, 284 AD2d 116, 117…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cespedes v. Mike & Jac Trucking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Tsai v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Nussbaum v. D'AmicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Palacios v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ellis v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API