Legal Opinion

Hall v. McNeil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order permitting the codefendant Jack S. Scott to be represented by two attorneys at an examination before trial. Inasmuch as the examination before trial has been completed and only one attorney representing the defendant asked questions, the order has limited significance. Were it not for the likelihood that the question of dual representation will continue in the future, we would dismiss this appeal as moot. This issue persists, however, by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Rimar v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. New York Mutual Underwriters v. CavallaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Allstate Insurance v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. RICCI, MATTHEWAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. RicciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. RicciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Travelers Indemnity Company v. AXIS Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API