Legal Opinion

City of Memphis v. Ingram

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1951No. J-703PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRIMBLE, Chief Judge.

The City of Memphis, a municipal corporation of the State of Tennessee, brought this action against W. K. Ingram, County Judge of Crittenden County, Arkansas; Arkansas and Memphis Railway Bridge and Terminal Company, a corporation; and Crittenden County, Arkansas. It is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from dismantling the roadways, sometimes called wagon roadways, which are bracketed on to the sides of what is commonly called the Harahan Railroad Bridge, owned and operated by the bridge company, across the Mississippi River, between Crittenden County,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  5. Smith v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chambers-Liberty Counties Navigation District v. Parker Brothers & Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API