Legal Opinion

Frey v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 18, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas.

Affirming.

The appellant, Bruno Frey, was indicted by the grand jury of Ohio county, for violating the local option law by selling intoxicating liquors in said county where the local option law was in force at the time. Upon his trial, after the entering by him of a plea of not guilty, he was convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $60.00 and confinement in the county jail for twenty days. Failing to obtain a new trial he prosecutes this appeal.

Several complaints are made to the judgment, each of which so far as we deem necessary will be considered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hyser v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Smith v. TheobaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Frey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Gourley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Partin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Jones' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API