Legal Opinion
Cooney v. East Nassau Medical Group
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 28, 1988PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Murphy, P. J.
After a traverse hearing, the Special Referee concluded that plaintiffs had succeeded in obtaining personal jurisdiction over defendant partnership East Nassau Medical Group, but had failed to obtain jurisdiction over defendant Dr. Alfred E. Cave. These findings were confirmed by the court which accordingly severed and dismissed the action as against Cave but denied defendant East Nassau Medical Group’s motion to dismiss the action as against it.
We conclude that the Referee’s report was in error both as to its finding that jurisdiction had been obtained over…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Feinstein v. BergnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Fashion Page, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- McDonald v. Ames Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Markoff v. South Nassau Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by13 opinions
- Goetz v. Synthesys Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Sartor v. Utica Taxi Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Broman v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Reed Holdings Inc. v. O.P.C. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Bell v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.