Layton v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. Under the Carmack amendment to the interstate-commerce act, a suit on a bill of lading for loss of or damage to freight shall be maintained by the holder of the bill of lading, or by the party entitled to recover thereon. This does not mean that a suit can be maintained by one whose mere physical possession of the bill is wrongful, or which amounts to nothing more than that of a fiduciary custodian for the actual owner (Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Evans, 35 Ga. App. 438 (134 S. E. 122); but under the Cummins amendment, the “holder” of a bill of lading, such as is entitled to maintain an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hatch v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Nelson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- United Brokers Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Beltrami Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast R. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947