Legal Opinion

Sanborn County v. Lutter

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1923No. File No. 5099PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPo'Lley, J.

The defendant has a daughter who is without means of support, who is past the age of majority, and who has been adjudged insane and been confined in the State Hospital for the.Insane since the year 1915. During such confinement San-born county, the county of defendant’s domicile, and the domicile-of said insane person at the timé she was adjudged insane, has-paid to the state the amount fixed by statute for the care, support and treatment of said insane person while at said hospital. The-county, desiring reimbursement for the sums of money so paid out, made demand therefor on the defendant.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Western Farm Tractor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. County of Delaware v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Rowell v. Town of VershireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890
  4. McCook County v. KammossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Inhabitants of Templeton v. StrattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jameson v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Haakon County v. StaleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Schmidt v. Clark CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Tesch v. TeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Mower v. MowerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API