Chambers v. Geiger
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The State of New Hampshire (the State), plaintiff’s employer, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Mohl, J.) relating to plaintiff’s workers’ compensation and third-party tortfeasor claims. The decision excludes from the State’s statutory lien against plaintiff’s tort suit recovery the amount the State paid for plaintiff’s vocational rehabilitation. See RSA 281:14, I. The defendants were not affected by the trial court’s decision and assert no claim on appeal. At issue here is the interpretation of then-effective RSA 281:14, I. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
This case arises out…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Greenhalge v. Town of DunbartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- New Hampshire Retirement System v. SununuSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Hamby v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Glick v. Town of OssipeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Appeal of Rehabilitation Associates of New EnglandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
3Cited by10 opinions
- Manchester School District v. Crisman Ex Rel. Kimberli M.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Union Leader Corp. v. FennimanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In re MarkievitzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Barksdale v. Town of EpsomSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.