Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Geiger

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1990No. 89-157PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The State of New Hampshire (the State), plaintiff’s employer, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Mohl, J.) relating to plaintiff’s workers’ compensation and third-party tortfeasor claims. The decision excludes from the State’s statutory lien against plaintiff’s tort suit recovery the amount the State paid for plaintiff’s vocational rehabilitation. See RSA 281:14, I. The defendants were not affected by the trial court’s decision and assert no claim on appeal. At issue here is the interpretation of then-effective RSA 281:14, I. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

This case arises out…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenhalge v. Town of DunbartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. New Hampshire Retirement System v. SununuSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Hamby v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Glick v. Town of OssipeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. Appeal of Rehabilitation Associates of New EnglandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Manchester School District v. Crisman Ex Rel. Kimberli M.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Union Leader Corp. v. FennimanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. In re MarkievitzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Barksdale v. Town of EpsomSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API