Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Courtney R. Logan v. State of Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided August 18, 2015No. 2012-KA-01963-COAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJames, J.

¶ 49. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion on the issue of Logan’s *1026habitual-offender status. The majority is correct that Logan’s argument is procedurally barred because he did not raise the argument before the trial court. Conner v. State, 138 So.3d 143, 150 (¶ 19) (Miss.2014). However, a defendant has a fundamental right of freedom from an illegal sentence, and this Coürt may employ plain-error review if a defendant’s substantive or fundamental rights are affected. Id. at 150-51 (¶ 19).

¶ 50., Logan argues that the State failed to prove Logan’s habitual-offender status beyond a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Grayer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Conner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. People v. CarpenteurNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API