Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Kidder Peabody & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Elliott Wilk, J.

Motion sequence numbers 001 and 002 are combined for disposition. Petitioners move for an order of attachment and for a preliminary injunction pursuant to CPLR 7502 (c). Respondents cross-move to dismiss the petition and to quash subpoenas. *3Four nonparty PaineWebber executives move to quash subpoenas. Petitioners move to remove Janet Tavakoli as a party. Petitioners cross-move to add Jeffrey Unger as a petitioner. Petitioners’ motion to add party respondents has been withdrawn.

Petitioners are all Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc. employees who either have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. v. RuebsamenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Habitations Ltd. v. BKL Realty Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Slavin v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Founders Insurance v. Everest National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API