Legal Opinion

In Re Battani

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 20, 1934No. 15,070, 13,762, 9,863, 14,629, 14,056PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

6 F.Supp. 376 (1934)

In re BATTANI et al.

ECKHOUT

v.

GUARDIAN NAT. BANK OF COMMERCE OF DETROIT et al.

Nos. 15,070, 13,762, 9,863, 14,629, 14,056.

District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

February 20, 1934.

McLeod, Fixel, Abbott & Fixel, Frederick B. Darden, and William W. Brashear, all of Detroit, Mich., for petitioners.

Frank E. Wood and Harry Kasfir, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, and William C. Allee, of Detroit, Mich., for B. C. Schram, receiver of Guardian Nat. Bank of Commerce.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The Union Guardian Trust Company, as receiver of Andrew Battani and Julius Battani, doing business as…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Board of Com'rs v. StrawnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  5. Green Bay & Minnesota Railroad v. Union Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  2. Irving Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API